EVE Search - CCP, Where are you going wiith all of these changes?

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

CCP, Where are you going wiith all of these changes?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 96 post(s)
Scott Ryder Infestation.	Posted - 2007.11.13 12:10:00 - [1] Originally by: CCP Zulupark Originally by: Shevar Originally by: CCP Zulupark The raw DPS of an Absolution is similar to the Sleipnir (a quick check gave me 618,6 DPS from guns only with 2x heat sinks). The Sleipnir does 617,2 DPS (220mm Vulcan Autocannon II, 2x gyrostabilizers) The problem is the omni tank, and that's something we want to look into. No it's not only the omni tank, if you say it's similar DPS then please consider the following as well; -Sleip uses 0 cap for it's weapons leaving 18 cap/s at peak recharge -Abso uses 13 cap/s for it's weapons leaving only 5 cap/s at peak recharge Does this seem to be similar cap left to tank/ew as the sleip? If not then why would it be "fair" to have comparable DPS? Yes omni tanks ARE part of the problem (actually the real problem is innate resitances, it's that shield tanks aren't popular otherwise minmatar would have similar issues (but then again they can just use another ammo type)). One solution would be to nerf omni tanks but really an easier solution would be to increase DPS of lasers. But this wouldn't change the fact that amarr laser ships have significantly less cap/s to use then the other ships with absolutely 0 advantages. I still think that the root of the problem is omni tanking and high natural EM resistances. That looks to be the solution, Nerf the amarr tanks! A harbinger 7 heavy modulated beam (Equal to t2 heavy beam lasers, but less fitting and costs more) G or M Crystals Cap booster, Webber and disruptor 2x t2 Energized adaptive nano membranes 2x t2 active hardeners T2 medium armor rep Last low is Rcu or Heatsink Rigs: T1 grid rig. 2x t1 cap recharger rigs. I fit 2 cap recharger rigs on almost any amarr ship to compansate for the fact that it is amarr. Buildcost 130 million isk? VS A drake, the caldari battlecruiser equal to the harbinger. A passive tanked drake rigged, fitted a large shield and some t1 missile launchers. Who do win? The drake as my dps is lower then his passive recharge rate peak, not to mention his 30000 shields or something. But yea i see the problem with the amarr tank

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.